FIND A CONTRACTOR BUYER'S GUIDE
BECOME AN INDUSTRY PARTNER
MCAA Logo
MEMBER LOGIN JOIN
NEWS
The 2026 MCAA Annual Online Auction is Now Open ↗

Can standard veneer anchors handle the loads of larger cavities?

Words: Dan KamysMason contractors across the country face similar challenges when out in the field. With the help of Hohmann and Barnard’s director of technical services, Jeremy Douglas, Masonry delivers answers to some of your most technical, complicated questions.

Q. We’ve been seeing larger brick veneer wall cavity spans over the last several years, but the veneer anchors we have been using are still the same. Can standard veneer anchors handle the loads they need to within these larger cavities?

A. Sure, I address this issue pretty much every day of the week in one way or another. This has become a major concern for several reasons.

First, while the TMS-402 code only requires a 1-inch air cavity, most designers and masonry entities recognize that a larger air cavity is more desirable. Because construction tolerances of the backup and veneer walls typically run at ±1/4 inch, they potentially jeopardize 50 percent of that airspace should they run outboard and inboard of those tolerances, respectively. Additionally, the need for higher R-values in our exterior continuous insulation has increased the span, as has the expanded use of mineral wool insulation to more easily create NFPA 285-compliant assemblies. We also see larger airspaces today to help to better achieve pressure equalization between the air in the cavity and the outside.

The same TMS-402 referenced above states that a 4 1/2-inch maximum distance between the inside face of the veneer and the steel framing, masonry, or concrete backing, with a minimum of 1 inch of air space, shall be specified. This means that, currently, we must provide engineering calculations for any cavity spans larger than 4 1/2 inches. What the code doesn’t suggest is any specific performance criteria for any anchors to be held to in order to be considered adequate.

The closest thing the masonry industry has to a performance standard regarding anchor load capacities would be Tech Note 44B as published by the Brick Industry Association. 44B suggests we should be working only with ties that show maximum deflections of less than 0.05 inch (1.2 mm) when tested at an axial load of 100 lbs. in tension or compression. Sounds pretty straightforward, right? Well, not exactly.

Two-part masonry anchors often consist of a portion of the anchor fixed to the backup wall and an adjustable tie, usually formed from 3/16-inch wire to be embedded in the veneer joint. If we’re considering a performance standard as I suggested above, that standard must apply to the anchor/tie combination everywhere within its plane of adjustability. As an example, the TMS-402 code allows for 3/16-inch pintle hook anchors to be offset no more than 1 1/4 inches. In evaluating how a standard round wire pintle performs across this 1 1/4 inches of adjustability, testing a standard wall configuration inside the 4 1/2 inches shows us a nearly 90 percent reduction in strength from the point where the pintle and anchor are completely engaged to where the pintle is offset 1 1/4 inches. This hasn’t even taken into account changes in pintle size or larger airspaces, brick corbelling, or other scenarios where the airspace can potentially become larger than 3 inches.

So, to answer the question, a standard masonry anchor may or may not be able to handle the expanded cavity. A lot of factors need to be taken into consideration, which is why the code calls for engineering calculations beyond 4 1/2 inches. You may also see anchors referred to as “high strength” or as being specifically manufactured for “wide cavity walls” to address some of the concerns mentioned above. For now, the only way to be certain is for engineering personnel to evaluate testing that shows the load performance of the anchor throughout its adjustability and specific to the conditions in which it will exist.
 0
Smarter Time Tracking on the Jobsite: Introducing Geofence Notifications and Logging in CrewTracks
April 2026

For masonry contractors, time tracking is more than just a payroll task; it’s a key part of managing crews, understanding job costs, and keeping projects running smoothly. Yet many companies still struggle with one common challenge: making sure employees

Erin Koets
MAP Partner
Read More
Fechino Files: Diesels Below 32 Degrees
April 2026

I am guessing that if you are reading this, then you experienced the cold, late-January spell that took over most of the country. The cold weather has many effects on the operations of a masonry contractor, from job shutdowns to equipment starting issues,

Steven Fechino
Fechino Files
Read More
Outreach Outlook: Building Momentum Across the Southern Region
April 2026

As April arrives, the pace of our outreach and workforce efforts across the Southern Region reaches a new level of intensity. This is the time of year when our programs, partners, and state collaborators all accelerate at once. SkillsUSA competitions are

Conner Birdsong
Outreach Outlook
Read More
Marvelous Masonry: Elbphilharmonie
April 2026

Most people know the Elbphilharmonie for its glass façade and dramatic roofline. From a distance, that’s what defines the skyline in Hamburg’s HafenCity district. But for masonry contractors and suppliers, the real story starts at the base.

Cass Stern
Marvelous Masonry
Read More