Concrete Block: Recent Changes to ASTM Standards and Code for Concrete Block

Close-up view of a concrete masonry prism test after ASTM C1314 compression testing
Close-up view of a concrete masonry prism test after ASTM C1314 compression testing

Whether you realize it or not, the concrete block you are using is stronger than it was a few years ago! The National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA) conducted an extensive test program of modern concrete block assemblies, and determined that the unit compressive strength properties that have been in the Code for decades were based on more variable test methods from the 1950’s through the 1980’s that led to very conservative strength values used by design engineers. The NCMA study findings were published in a report dated July 2, 2012 entitled “Recalibration of the Unit Strength Method for Verifying Compliance with the Specified Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry” (MR37).

The end result of this study is a new unit strength table that is already in the masonry Code and Specifications (the 2013 TMS 602-13 a.k.a. the MSJC Code). This new table generally provides higher assembly compressive strengths (fʹm) for a given combination of block strength and mortar type. The old table is shown in Table 1 and the new table is shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Unit compressive strength table for masonry assemblies from 2011 and previous versions of the Code (TMS 602/MSJC).

Net area compressive strength of concrete masonry units, lb/in.2 (MPa) Net area compressive strength of masonryA, lb/in.2 (MPa)
Type M or S Mortar Type N Mortar
--- 1,900 (13.10) 1,350 (9.31)
1,900 (13.10) 2,150 (14.82) 1,500 (10.34)
2,800 (19.31) 3,050 (21.03) 2,000 (13.79)
3,750 (25.86) 4,050 (27.92) 2,500 (17.24)
4,800 (33.10) 5,250 (36.20) 3,000 (20.69)

AFor units less than 4 in. (102 mm) in height, 85% of the values listed.

Table 2. Unit compressive strength table for masonry assemblies from 2013 version of the Code (TMS 602/MSJC).

Net area compressive strength of concrete masonry, psi (MPa) Net area compressive strength of concrete masonry units, psi (MPa)
Type M or S Mortar Type N Mortar
1,700 (11.72) --- 1,900 (13.10)
1,900 (13.10) 1,900 (13.10) 2,350 (14.82)
2,000 (13.79) 2,000 (13.79) 2,650 (18.27)
2,250 (15.51) 2,600 (17.93) 3,400 (23.44)
2,500 (17.24) 3,250 (22.41) 4,350 (28.96)
2,750 (18.96) 3,900 (26.89) -----
3,000 (20.69) 4,500 (31.03) -----

1For units of less than 4 in. (102 mm) nomianl height, use 85 percent of the values listed.

These tables can be confusing (even to the designers using them), so an example can give some idea of the effects of the change. With a Type N mortar in the old (2011 and previous) Code, in order to provide an assembly compressive strength (fʹm) of 2,000 psi, the concrete block strength needed to be 3,050 psi. Now, a 2,000 psi fʹm only requires the block to be 2,650 psi.

The NCMA research also recommended a new minimum concrete block compressive strength of 2000 psi. This change has already been made to the ASTM Standard (C90) in 2014.

So what does this mean for masonry contractors? Masonry designs will use the masonry strength more effectively and this will help make masonry a bit more competitive. Maybe more importantly, you may be able to solve a “low break” problem with a concrete block prism simply by pointing to a newer version of the Code. Since most designers use the Unit Strength tables to determine fʹm, lower compression test results on block units could still provide adequate fʹm values using the 2013 Code, even if they were too low using the 2011 Code. So the next time an engineer wants you to tear down your CMU wall, the solution might be as simple as showing him a new edition of the Code!

GEN NXT: Mason Paolini
May 2026

This month, the MCAA got to talk with Mason Paolini, a mason who has a clear passion and talent for the trade he has such high praise for. Read about Mason’s story and why he sees a future in this industry. Mason Paolini’s career began with a simple desi

Marvelous Masonry: Tianjin Zhongshuge Library
May 2026

It is not unusual today for masonry to be treated as a surface decision rather than a structural one. Too often, brick enters a project late in the process, trimmed back by budgets or reduced to a veneer once the “real” building work is finished. The Tian

Fechino Files: Concrete Pavers around a Pool
May 2026

Many folks over the years have placed concrete pavers around their pool as a nice form of decorative pool deck. Early in the 2000’s, I took a class held by the Interlocking Concrete Paver Institute, then known as the ICPI. At the time I attended the class

Chairman's Message: Staying the Course
May 2026

Spring is one of my favorite times of year. There’s energy in the air. Jobs are picking up. Crews are hitting their rhythm. Schedules are filling up. You can feel momentum building again. And every year around this time, I find myself thinking about con