Concrete Block: Recent Changes to ASTM Standards and Code for Concrete Block

Close-up view of a concrete masonry prism test after ASTM C1314 compression testing
Close-up view of a concrete masonry prism test after ASTM C1314 compression testing

Whether you realize it or not, the concrete block you are using is stronger than it was a few years ago! The National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA) conducted an extensive test program of modern concrete block assemblies, and determined that the unit compressive strength properties that have been in the Code for decades were based on more variable test methods from the 1950’s through the 1980’s that led to very conservative strength values used by design engineers. The NCMA study findings were published in a report dated July 2, 2012 entitled “Recalibration of the Unit Strength Method for Verifying Compliance with the Specified Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry” (MR37).

The end result of this study is a new unit strength table that is already in the masonry Code and Specifications (the 2013 TMS 602-13 a.k.a. the MSJC Code). This new table generally provides higher assembly compressive strengths (fʹm) for a given combination of block strength and mortar type. The old table is shown in Table 1 and the new table is shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Unit compressive strength table for masonry assemblies from 2011 and previous versions of the Code (TMS 602/MSJC).

Net area compressive strength of concrete masonry units, lb/in.2 (MPa) Net area compressive strength of masonryA, lb/in.2 (MPa)
Type M or S Mortar Type N Mortar
--- 1,900 (13.10) 1,350 (9.31)
1,900 (13.10) 2,150 (14.82) 1,500 (10.34)
2,800 (19.31) 3,050 (21.03) 2,000 (13.79)
3,750 (25.86) 4,050 (27.92) 2,500 (17.24)
4,800 (33.10) 5,250 (36.20) 3,000 (20.69)

AFor units less than 4 in. (102 mm) in height, 85% of the values listed.

Table 2. Unit compressive strength table for masonry assemblies from 2013 version of the Code (TMS 602/MSJC).

Net area compressive strength of concrete masonry, psi (MPa) Net area compressive strength of concrete masonry units, psi (MPa)
Type M or S Mortar Type N Mortar
1,700 (11.72) --- 1,900 (13.10)
1,900 (13.10) 1,900 (13.10) 2,350 (14.82)
2,000 (13.79) 2,000 (13.79) 2,650 (18.27)
2,250 (15.51) 2,600 (17.93) 3,400 (23.44)
2,500 (17.24) 3,250 (22.41) 4,350 (28.96)
2,750 (18.96) 3,900 (26.89) -----
3,000 (20.69) 4,500 (31.03) -----

1For units of less than 4 in. (102 mm) nomianl height, use 85 percent of the values listed.

These tables can be confusing (even to the designers using them), so an example can give some idea of the effects of the change. With a Type N mortar in the old (2011 and previous) Code, in order to provide an assembly compressive strength (fʹm) of 2,000 psi, the concrete block strength needed to be 3,050 psi. Now, a 2,000 psi fʹm only requires the block to be 2,650 psi.

The NCMA research also recommended a new minimum concrete block compressive strength of 2000 psi. This change has already been made to the ASTM Standard (C90) in 2014.

So what does this mean for masonry contractors? Masonry designs will use the masonry strength more effectively and this will help make masonry a bit more competitive. Maybe more importantly, you may be able to solve a “low break” problem with a concrete block prism simply by pointing to a newer version of the Code. Since most designers use the Unit Strength tables to determine fʹm, lower compression test results on block units could still provide adequate fʹm values using the 2013 Code, even if they were too low using the 2011 Code. So the next time an engineer wants you to tear down your CMU wall, the solution might be as simple as showing him a new edition of the Code!

Holding History Together: The Art of Lateral Restraint in Masonry Restoration
January 2026

The first thing you notice about an old masonry building isn’t always its beauty. Sometimes it’s the bow in a wall or the way time and the elements have tugged at the mortar joints. Every century-old structure carries its story in cracks, tilts, bows, and

Stone Savvy: Helping Clients Choose Stone with Intent
January 2026

In today’s design environment, clients are surrounded by inspiration, endless images, samples, and styles that make choosing materials feel exciting and overwhelming all at once. Within that sea of options, stone carries weight. It defines first impressio

MASONRY STRONG Podcast, Episode 36 Recap: Kim Spahn, CEO of the Concrete Masonry Checkoff
January 2026

On this episode of the MASONRY STRONG Podcast, Justin got to sit down for a conversation with Kim Spahn to talk about the Concrete Masonry Checkoff, how Kim first got involved in this industry, and much more.

From Day One to Long-Term Success: Onboarding Strategies for Contractors
January 2026

The construction industry is facing one of its toughest challenges in decades. Companies are struggling to find enough skilled workers while competing to keep the ones they have. At the same time, projects are becoming more complex, deadlines are tighter,